Interracial marriage was legal there, and the couple wed.

在那里种族通婚是合法的，这对情侣结为了夫妻。

Restrictions against interracial marriage remained in effect well into the 20th century.

对于不同种族通婚的限制一直到20世纪都还有效。

But among the various solutions to the problem, the interracial marriage has its own benefits.

但是在解决这一问题的过程中，每对 跨国交往的情侣都能从中各有所获。

Same-sex and interracial marriages are now protected under a federal law that President Biden signed today.

今天，拜登总统签署了一项联邦法律，保护同性婚姻和跨种族婚姻。

In 1967, the Supreme Court ruled in Loving v. Virginia, and invalidated all laws that prohibited interracial marriage.

1967年，最高法院在洛文诉弗吉尼亚案中裁定了所有禁止种族通婚的律法违宪。

Their foes cite Loving v Virginia, the 1967 case that overturned bans on interracial marriage without triggering much resentment.

他们的敌人引用了Loving 诉弗吉尼亚州一案，这个1967年的案子在没有引发太多不满的情况下推翻了异族通婚的禁令。

They struck down laws banning interracial marriage, saying the U.S. Constitution permitted individuals, not the state, to decide whom to marry.

他们推翻了禁止种族通婚的法律，并指出美国法律允许个人，而不是国家，决定和谁结婚。

This is what we would call interracial dating and interracial marriage.

这就是我们所说的跨种族约会和跨种族婚姻。

Interracial marriage is an example of exogamy, or marriage between people of different social categories.

异族通婚是异族通婚或不同社会类别的人之间通婚的一个例子。

Well, the trend is for more interracial marriages.

好吧，趋势是更多的跨种族婚姻。

Well, talking about immigrants and people from different backgrounds, our second topic today is about interracial marriage.

好吧， 说到移民和来自不同背景的人，我们今天的第二个话题是跨种族婚姻。

The total number of interracial marriages in United States is small, less than five percent.

美国异族通婚的总数很少，不到百分之五。

One of the lawyers Theodore Orson compared the ban to that on interracial marriages which was overturned by the court in the 1960s. Jonny Dymond reports.

其中一位律师西奥多·奥森将该禁令比作20世纪60年代被最高法院推翻的异族通婚禁令。约翰尼·戴蒙德报道。

In fact, according to one study, even as late as 1958, 96% of white Americans frowned upon interracial marriage.

事实上，根据一项研究， 即使在 1958 年，96% 的美国白人都不赞成异族通婚。

Anti-miscegenation laws, which outlawed interracial marriage, were not ruled unconstitutional until 1967, in the aptly named Supreme Court case Loving vs Virginia.

禁止异族通婚的反通婚法直到 1967 年才被裁定违宪，最高法院的案件名称恰如其分，名为 Loving vs Virginia。

Supreme Court, to say to itself, as they did with interracial marriage, we can't really have a country permanently with two systems of marriage.

最高法院自言自语地说，就像他们对待异族婚姻一样，我们不可能真的有一个国家永久实行两种婚姻制度。

And at that point, there's going to be pressure on the Supreme Court, US Supreme Court, to say to itself, as they did with interracial marriage, we can't really have a country permanently with two systems of marriage.

到那时，美国最高法院将面临压力，要求自己对自己说，就像他们对异族婚姻所做的那样，我们不可能真正拥有一个永久拥有两种婚姻制度的国家。