Virginia acts like Brown versus Board of Education never happened.

布朗告赢教育局的案子好像没发生一样。

The case of Brown versus Board of Education provided the basis for other court decisions.

" 布朗诉教育委员会案" 为其他法院的判决提供了依据。

In Brown versus Board of Education 1954, Supreme Court justices unanimously ruled that racially segregated schools were unconstitutional.

在1954年布朗诉教育委员会案中，最高法院法官一致裁定，种族隔离的学校是违宪的。

Legal experts say that Thurgood Marshall's most important case was the one known as Brown versus Board of Education.

法律专家表示，瑟古德·马歇尔最重要的案件是" 布朗诉教育委员会案" 。

It was 1954, the year she got her teaching certificate, and the year the Supreme Court ruled in Brown versus Board of Education.

那是在 1954年，她获得了教师资格证书，也是在这一年，最高法院对布朗诉教育委员会案做出裁决。

Brown versus Board of education was handed down this week in 1954. It was actually five separate cases that were before the court.

布朗诉教育委员会案于 1954 年于本周宣判。实际上有五个不同的案件提交法庭审理。

Well, the U.S. Supreme Court`s Brown versus Board of Education ruling in 1954 said that states cannot segregate or separate black and whitestudents in school.

好吧，美国最高法院在 1954 年的布朗诉教育委员会裁决中说， 各州不能在学校隔离或隔离黑人和白人学生。

It took Thurgood Marshall and the NAACP decades to win Brown vs. Board of Education; and then another decade after that to secure the Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act.

瑟古德·马歇尔 (Thurgood Marshall) 和全国有色人种协进会 (NAACP) 花了数十年时间才赢得布朗与教育委员会的对决；然后又过了十年， 以确保民权法案和投票权法案的通过。

I think that the origins of the so-called choice movement in schooling was about trying to get around Brown versus Board of Education and was about trying to get around equity and integration.

我认为学校教育中所谓的选择运动的起源是关于试图绕过布朗与教育委员会，并试图绕过公平和融合。

And 50 years ago the U.S. Supreme Court betrayed the age May 17, 1954, Brown vs. Board of Education came down and put the lie to the idea that separate can ever really be equal.

50 年前， 美国最高法院背叛了 1954 年 5 月 17 日的年龄， 布朗诉教育委员会案落下帷幕，并驳斥了分开永远可以真正平等的想法。

Early achievements included the 1954 decision Brown vs. Board of Education of Topeka, where the Supreme Court reversed decades of segregating schools, declaring that the system was inherently unequal and therefore went against the Fourteenth Amendment.

早期取得的成就有1954年发生在托皮卡的"布朗对抗教育委员会"一案的决议，在这个决议中，最高法院改变了在学校实行了几十年的种族隔离的做法，宣称隔离制度本质上是不平等的，因而违背了第十四条修正案。